RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Index of Articles (Date of Posting)

May 2007

Federal Subsistence Board Upholds Ninilchik Priority (05/05/07)

 

April 2007

House Passes Resolution Requesting Kenai C&T be Rescinded  (04/30/07)

Federal Subsistence Board to Reconsider Ninilchik C&T (04/30/07)

Federal Subsistence Board to Decide on Kenai Fisheries (04/30/07)

Federal Subsistence Board to Consider Regional Council Composition (04/30/07)

 

February 2007
House Fisheries Committee to Consider Ninilchik Priority (02/19/07)

State Requests Reconsideration of Federal Actions (02/19/07)

Kenai Peninsula Subcommittee Makes Little Progress (02/19/07)

Deadline for Federal Subsistence Fisheries Proposals Approaches (02/19/07)

 

January 2007

Federal Subsistence Board Changes Fishing Regulations (01/18/07)

Rural Status Changes for Alaska Communities (01/18/07)

New Members Appointed to Regional Councils (01/18/07)

Southeast Purse Seine Fishery Scrutinized (01/18/07)

Subcommittee Considers Kenai Peninsula Proposals (01/18/07)

Subsistence Halibut Survey Results (01/18/07)

Federal Subsistence Board Calls for Proposals (01/18/07)

 

December 2006

Federal Subsistence Board Meets to Determine Rural/Nonrural Status (12/11/06)
Application Period Open for Regional Advisory Council Seats - Deadline January 10th (12/11/06)
Federal Subsistence Board Decides Kenai, Southeast Issues at Worksession (12/11/06)
Public Comment Sought on Kenai Fisheries Proposals - Deadline January 5th (12/11/06)

 

September 2006

26 Changes to Subsistence Fishing Regulations Proposed (09/19/06)

Kodiak May Lose Rural Status - Changes Also Proposed for Other Communities (09/19/06)

Court Upholds Rural Subsistence Priority (09/19/06)

Kenai Fishery Proposals Due October 20th (09/19/06)

Written C&T and Closure Criteria Still Pending (09/19/06)

Board Denies Kasilof Coho Fishery (09/19/06)

Kenai Council Proposal Meets with Opposition (09/19/06)

 

August 2006

Federal Subsistence Board Proposes Changes in Rural/Nonrural Status - Comment by October 27th (08/24/06)
Fleagle Named Chair of Federal Subsistence Board (08/24/06)

Creation of a Kenai Regional Advisory Council Proposed - Comment by September 18th (08/24/06)
Federal Subsistence Board Considers Draft Closure Policy (08/24/06) 
Call for Proposed Changes to Kenai Hunting and Fishing Regulations - Proposals Due October 20th  (08/24/06)

Public Comment Sought on Subsistence Halibut Information Collection - Comment by September 5th  (08/24/06)
 

 

 

FOR NEWS STORIES PRIOR TO AUGUST 2006, VISIT OUR NEWS ARCHIVES PAGE

 

Federal Subsistence Board Upholds Ninilchik Priority (05/05/07)

At a May 2nd meeting, the Federal Subsistence Board deliberated on a request from the State of Alaska to reconsider the finding that residents of Ninilchik have customarily and traditionally used fish in the Kenai River.  The Board did not reverse its Nov. 17, 2006 decision to grant Ninilchik residents a subsistence fishing priority on the Kenai.  As a result, Ninilchik residents continue to be eligible to harvest fish under federal subsistence regulations in federal public waters of the Kenai River area.

The Board will consider federal subsistence regulations, including seasons, methods of harvest, and harvest limits, for the Kenai River and Kasilof River drainages when it meets May 8-10 in Anchorage.

House Passes Resolution Requesting Kenai C&T be Rescinded (04/30/07)

The House of Representatives has passed a resolution, known as House Joint Resolution 4, requesting that the Federal Subsistence Board rescind the subsistence fishing priority for residents of Hope, Cooper Landing, Ninilchik, and Happy Valley on the Kenai and Kasilof rivers.  The positive customary and traditional use determination, made by the board at a November worksession, gives residents of these Kenai Peninsula communities a priority for harvest of fish in the area.  The area is popular with sport and personal use fishermen.  The Alaska Department of Fish and Game opposed the positive customary and traditional use determination and has also requested that the Federal Subsistence Board reconsider the decision.  The board will act on part of the state's request for reconsideration at its April 30th - May 2nd meeting in Anchorage.

The resolution passed the House on a 22-11 vote.  It must still be considered by the Senate, where it will be heard in the resources committee.  Senators Wagoner, Bunde, Therriault, McGuire, Wilken, and Huggins have signed on to the resolution as sponsors. 

To read the resolution (Adobe Acrobat Reader required) follow this link http://www.legis.state.ak.us/PDF/25/Bills/HJR004A.PDF

For information on how to comment on a resolution, contact your local Legislative Information Office.

 

Federal Subsistence Board to Reconsider Ninilchik C&T (04/30/07)

The Federal Subsistence Board will hold its annual meeting to consider wildlife proposals April 30 - May 2 at the Sheraton Anchorage Hotel.  Also on the agenda is a request for reconsideration filed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game asking the Federal Subsistence Board to rescind its decision granting Ninilchik residents a positive customary and traditional use finding for the Kenai River.   The board will consider the state's claim that the determination is overly broad and based on the incorrect assumption that fish harvested outside of federal waters are the same stocks harvested inside the area.  Federal staff is opposing the request to rescind the decision. 

For meeting materials and information, visit http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/fsb.cfm?bmm=1.

To read the staff analysis of the request for reconsideration, go to http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/pdf/meetingbooks/spring07/frfr06-09.pdf.

 

Federal Subsistence Board to Decide on Kenai Fisheries (04/30/07)

The Federal Subsistence Board will meet May 8-10 at the Coast International Inn in Anchorage to consider subsistence fishing proposals for the Kenai Peninsula.  It is likely that the board will establish subsistence fisheries for Kenai and Kasilof river salmon, Dolly Varden, and trout.  The Southcentral Regional Advisory Council has recommended a dip net and rod and reel fishery on the Upper Kasilof to allow harvest of up to 500 chinook, coho, and pink salmon and 4000 sockeye salmon as well as a dip net and rod and reel fishery on the Kenai to harvest up to 1000 late-run chinook, 4000 sockeye, 3000 coho, and 2000 pink salmon.  The board will also consider a proposal by the Kenai River Sportfishing Association to rescind the subsistence priority for residents of Hope, Cooper Landing, and Ninilchik.

The board allows public testimony at its meetings and also accepts written comments. 

 For an agenda, meeting materials, and more information, visit http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/fsb.cfm?bmm=1

 For a summary of the Southcentral Council recommendations, see http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/pdf/meetingbooks/spring07/may08summary.pdf.

 

Federal Subsistence Board to Consider Regional Council Composition (04/30/07)

The Federal Subsistence Board will take action on the issue of balancing its Regional Advisory Councils at a meeting May 10th.  Currently, seventy percent of council members represent subsistence users, while the remaining thirty percent represent sport and commercial users.  A court decision required the board to reexamine the issue of balance on regional councils.  Although the court didn't disagree with the current 70/30 split, they did require that the board provide additional rationale for choosing such a split.  The Federal Advisory Committee Act requires committees to be fairly balanced, but that balance could be achieved in a number of ways.  The board will decide whether to continue with the current council composition or adopt a new method for balancing regional councils.

For meeting information and staff analysis, visit http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/fsb.cfm?bmm=1.

 

House Fisheries Committee to Consider Ninilchik Priority (02/19/07)

 
Representative Kurt Olson has drafted a resolution, known as House Joint Resolution 4, requesting that the Federal Subsistence Board reconsider the subsistence fishing priority for Ninilchik residents on the Kenai River.  The positive customary and traditional use determination made by the board at a November worksession gives Ninilchik residents a priority for harvest of fish in the area.  Ninilchik residents have proposed harvesting salmon with gillnets in the Kenai, which has proven controversial. The area is popular with sport and personal use fishermen.  The Alaska Department of Fish and Game opposed the positive customary and traditional use determination and has also requested that the Federal Subsistence Board reconsider the decision.  The board has not yet determined how it will deal with the request for reconsideration.
 
The first hearing of House Joint Resolution 4 will be held by the House Special Committee on Fisheries at 8:30am on February 26th.  The meeting will be teleconferenced for those outside of Juneau.  To read the resolution (Adobe Acrobat Reader required) follow this link http://www.legis.state.ak.us/PDF/25/Bills/HJR004A.PDF.  To make arrangements to attend the teleconference, contact your local Legislative Information Office.
 

State Requests Reconsideration of Federal Actions (02/19/07)

The State of Alaska, through the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, recently filed three requests for reconsideration asking the Federal Subsistence Board to revisit and rescind its recent decisions affecting Kenai Peninsula and Southeast Alaska fisheries.  The requests, filed by the State in January, request the Federal Subsistence Board reconsider three actions taken at the board’s November 2006 worksession. Specifically, the State has requested reconsideration of a finding that the community of Ninilchik has customarily and traditionally used all fish in all water bodies located within the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge and Chugach National Forest, including the upper Kenai River and the Russian River, an out-of-cycle special action granting the community of Ninilchik a winter gillnet trout fishery through the ice on Tustumena Lake, and a finding that the community of Gustavus has customarily and traditionally used specific fish in sections 14B and 14C of Southeast Alaska.

The Federal Subsistence Board has not yet determined how it will respond to the State's requests.  For more information, visit http://www.adfg.state.ak.us/news/issues/fsb_fishery_decision.php.

Kenai Peninsula Subcommittee Makes Little Progress (02/19/07)

A subcommittee of stakeholders tasked with making recommendations on federal subsistence fishing regulations for the Kenai Peninsula made little progress during its first meeting February 2nd and 3rd.  A second meeting has been scheduled for February 24th.  The subcommittee includes representatives from local tribes, communities, and commercial and sport fishing groups and is attempting to develop consensus recommendations on subsistence fishery proposals for federal waters within the Kenai, Kasilof, and Swanson river drainages and Six Mile and Resurrection creek drainages.  The subcommittee’s work focuses on methods and means of harvest, harvest limits, and fishing seasons.  The most controversial proposal under consideration by the subcommittee involves using gillnets for subsistence fishing in the Kenai and Kasilof rivers.  Ninilchik residents have proposed allowing a single community gillnet.  Federal staff has indicated that it may not be possible to restrict gillnetting to one net, since one group does not represent all eligible users in the region. 

The Southcentral Regional Advisory Council formed the subcommittee to solicit meaningful input from stakeholders in the area.  The Southcentral Council meets March 13-16th in Anchorage, where it will develop recommendations to forward to the Federal Subsistence Board.  The Federal Subsistence Board plans to address the issue at its May meeting.

For more information on the subcommittee or proposals being considered, contact Donald Mike, Southcentral Regional Council Coordinator at (907) 786-3629 or by e-mail at donald_mike@fws.gov.

Deadline for Federal Subsistence Fisheries Proposals Approaches (02/19/07)
 
The Federal Subsistence Board is accepting proposals through March 23, 2007 to change subsistence fishing regulations on federal public lands and waters in Alaska.  This is the first step in the development of regulations for the April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 regulatory year.

           

The board will consider proposals to change fishing seasons, harvest limits, restrictions on methods of harvest, and customary and traditional use determinations.  Federal public lands include national wildlife refuges; national parks, monuments and preserves; national forests; national wild and scenic rivers; and national conservation and recreation areas. Federal subsistence regulations do not apply on State of Alaska lands, private lands, military lands, or federal lands selected by the State or Native corporations.

 

To request a proposal form, contact the Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456 or by e-mail, subsistence@fws.gov.  The form can also be found under the Laws and Regulations – Fisheries section of the Federal Subsistence Program website, http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/home.html.

 

 

Federal Subsistence Board Changes Fishing Regulations (01/18/07)

 

In January, the Federal Subsistence Board made changes to federal subsistence fishing regulations in Southeast Alaska and Bristol Bay. The new regulations take effect April 1, 2007.

Bristol Bay Area

            The board voted to allow harvest of salmon with a drift gillnet on the lower two miles of the Togiak River.  Harvest will be allowed up to Fish and Game regulatory markers with gillnets up to ten fathoms long.  All salmon harvested with a drift gillnet much be marked by removal of either the dorsal fin or both lobes of the tail.  This new gear type mirrors a regulation adopted by the Alaska Board of Fisheries for state subsistence users at their December 2006 meeting.

            The board also expanded allowable methods for harvesting salmon in Lake Clark and its tributaries to include snagging, spear, bow and arrow, or hand capture.  When using these methods, a permit is not required.

            Beach seines up to 25 fathoms will be allowed for harvesting salmon in Lake Clark.  A motion to allow beach seines in Sixmile Lake was deferred to allow staff to analyze whether the lake is under federal jurisdiction.  The State Board of Fisheries adopted similar regulations for state subsistence users in December.

Southeast Alaska Area

            A proposal to close the commercial herring fishery in federal waters in Sitka Sound has been deferred by the Federal Subsistence Board until January 2008.  Rather than make an immediate decision on the closure, the board decided to form a working group of stakeholders including representatives from Sitka Tribe of Alaska, the Southeast Regional Advisory Council, the commercial fishery, the City and Borough of Sitka, the Sitka Fish and Game Advisory Committee, the Bureau of Land Management, the US Forest Service, and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.  The working group is charged with developing criteria for opening and closing the federal waters and will report to the board on a regular basis.

            The Sitka Sound sac roe fishery is one of the most lucrative commercial herring fisheries in the state.  Fifty one permit holders use purse seines to compete for a quota that has averaged 10,000 tons in recent years.  The Sitka Sound area is also one of the most important areas for subsistence harvest of roe on branches.  Recent surveys suggest that between 250,000 and 300,000 pounds may be harvested on a good year.

            The closure was proposed by the Sitka Tribe and the Southeast Regional Council following poor subsistence harvests in 2000 and 2005.  Although federal waters make up only a small portion of Sitka Sound, tribal representative Mike Miller called it part of the “core area” for subsistence harvesters because it is easily accessible, safe, and sheltered.  Opponents of the proposal expressed doubt that closing the small area would have much affect on the overall harvest.

            The board rejected five proposals to restrict the steelhead fishery in the Sitka area.  Reported harvest in the federal subsistence fishery in the area was only two fish in 2005 and three fish in 2006, although Alaska Department of Fish and Game staff raised questions about whether the reported harvest reflects the actual level of harvest.

            Board member Gary Edwards expressed reluctance to place further restrictions on subsistence users without data on the level of incidental harvest in commercial salmon fisheries.  The Alaska Board of Fisheries will consider requiring commercial salmon fishermen to report steelhead catch at their March meeting.

            Alaska Department of Fish and Game biologists have repeatedly expressed concerns about steelhead conservation, especially on streams with small populations, since the federal subsistence fishery was created in 2005.

            The board removed federal harvest limits for sockeye salmon on all systems in Southeast except the Stikine River.  Harvest limits will now mirror those in adjacent state subsistence and personal use fisheries.  State managers determine limits annually based on recent fishing patterns and the health of the resource.

            Currently, federal waters in Falls Lake and Gut Bay are closed everyone except federal subsistence users.  Using state limits for adjacent waters may liberalize opportunities on these systems.  The state objected to liberalizing harvest limits for federal subsistence users while the areas remain closed to other users.  However, federal staff stated that they do not expect harvest to increase under the new regulations.

            The customary and traditional use determination for the Icy Strait and Cross Sound area has been modified by the board.  Use of the area by Hoonah residents has been recognized by the federal program since regulations were first drafted in 1999.  At a November worksession, the board expanded the finding to include residents of Gustavus.  In January, the board adopted a recommendation from the Southeast Regional Council modifying the customary and traditional use finding for the area to include recognition for other residents of the region, including those who live in remote locations.  Boundaries were also clarified to leave existing customary and traditional use areas for residents of Angoon and Sitka unaffected.

             Under federal regulations, subsistence fisheries are open to all rural residents of Alaska unless a positive customary and traditional use finding has been made.  Once such a finding has been made, only those residents identified in the finding may fish in that area.

 Southcentral Area

          The board decided against developing any new regulations for the Southcentral area at this meeting.  They declined a proposal that would have allowed a dipnet salmon fishery on the lower Copper River and also decided against requiring that fish wheels in the Upper Copper River District be stored above the high water mark and operated at least 200 feet apart.

  

          Consideration of proposals for the Yukon River and the Kenai Peninsula area has been deferred to allow stakeholder groups time to consider the proposals.

 

          No proposals were received for the Yakutat, Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak, Norton Sound-Port Clarence, Kuskokwim, or Chignik areas.

 

 

Rural Status Changes for Alaska Communities (1/18/07)

 

Kodiak is still a rural community, but Saxman is not, according to the Federal Subsistence Board.  Along with residents of Point MacKenzie, Fritz Creek East and the North Fork Road area, Sterling, and Prudhoe Bay, Saxman residents will lose the ability to participate in federal subsistence hunts and fisheries after a five year waiting period.  The only community to newly acquire rural status under the Board’s decision is Adak.

            Rural designations are important to the federal program because the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) provides rural residents with a priority use of fish and game on federal public lands and waters.  Only rural residents can participate in federal subsistence hunts and fisheries.

            The board originally proposed grouping the City of Kodiak with the Mill Bay area, the Coast Guard station, Women’s Bay, Monashka Bay, and Bells Flats, and changing the status of the entire area from rural to non-rural.  The combined population of the area exceeds 12,000, well above the threshold of 7,000 at which federal regulations state that an area is assumed to be non-rural.  Regulations do provide for exceptions when a community above the population threshold exhibits significant rural characteristics.

            Kodiak residents testified that their community qualifies for an exception due to their reliance on subsistence harvested fish and game, the relative isolation of Kodiak, and the decline in the local economy.  The loss of commercial fishing jobs in Kodiak was specifically cited as an economic hardship.  Steve Branson, representing the Crewman’s Association, testified, “Now, more than ever, we need access to our subsistence stocks.”  The board apparently agreed with the heartfelt testimony provided by a wide variety of Kodiak residents, voting unanimously to maintain Kodiak’s rural status.

            Being grouped with the surrounding Ketchikan area resulted in a loss of rural status for the village of Saxman, along with others living on the Ketchikan road system.  Earlier in the rural review process, the board decided to group communities that are in close proximity and connected by road, share a high school, and where more than thirty percent of the workforce commutes between communities.  Saxman is only two miles by road from Ketchikan, Saxman students attend Ketchikan high school, and sixty-four percent of Saxman’s workers commute to Ketchikan.  Evaluation of these criteria led the board to conclude that Saxman should be grouped with the larger Ketchikan area.

            Saxman residents disagreed, citing other factors to support Saxman being considered independently, including a higher per capita use of fish and game, a high dropout rate for Saxman students attending Ketchikan schools, and higher unemployment and poverty rates.  Saxman residents testified before the board about the uniqueness of their community, arguing that they are a distinct and separate entity with their own social structure and independent government.

            Keith Goltz, legal advisor the Board, cautioned that maintaining Saxman’s rural status would be “extraordinarily difficult to defend.”  He pointed out that the rural area is one square mile completely surrounded by the non-rural area.

            Along with Saxman, the Ketchikan non-rural area will now encompass all areas on the road system connected to the City of Ketchikan, Pennock Island, and an expanded portion of Gravina Island.  If the road system expands in the future, the newly connected areas will be included in the non-rural area.

             Saxman residents have expressed interest in appealing the Board’s decision.  They have the option of filing a request for reconsideration, under which the Board could reexamine the ruling.

            Several other areas also changed status after being grouped with a larger non-rural area.  Point MacKenzie was found to be economically and socially integrated with the larger Wasilla/Palmer area. Fritz Creek East, not including Voznesenka, and the North Fork Road area were grouped with the non-rural Homer area.  The boundaries of Sterling, within the non-rural Kenai Area, were aligned with the U.S. Census Bureau’s recently expanded boundaries for Sterling.

            Residents of Adak will now be considered rural.  The isolated community experienced a significant population drop since rural status was last considered, largely due to closure of the naval base.  The current population is less than 200 residents and the community is accessible only by boat or plane.

            Prudhoe Bay was formerly considered a rural community by the board, but is now classified non-rural.  The board determined that the area is an industrial enclave, rather than a rural community.  Prudhoe Bay has no permanent residents at this time.

            A final rule implementing these changes will be drafted and published in the federal register.  For Adak, the only community to change from non-rural to rural, the change will be effective in thirty days.  Communities changing from rural to non-rural will experience a five year delay before the new status takes effect.

             In a related action, the Southeast Regional Advisory Council has petitioned the Secretary of Interior to reconsider the population threshold of 7,000 at which a community is assumed to be non-rural.  The threshold was originally based on the population of the City of Ketchikan at the time ANILCA passed.  Because federal regulations require that areas be grouped and considered together, the Southeast Council feels that the threshold should be based on the population of the greater Ketchikan area, which was 11,325 at the time ANILCA passed.  If the Secretary accepts the petition and proposes a change to federal regulations, a public comment and hearing process will be initiated.

 

 

New Members Appointed to Regional Councils (01/18/07)

 

Secretary of Interior Dirk Kempthorne, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns, has announced appointments and re-appointments to seats on the ten federal subsistence regional advisory councils.

            The Bristol Bay Regional Advisory Council has a new member, Thomas A. Hedlund of Iliamna.  Virginia Aleck of Chignik Lake and Randy C. Alvarez of Naknek were both reappointed.

            On the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Advisory Council, John W. Andrew of Kwethluk and Elias L. Kelly of Pilot Station are new members.  Robert E.Aloysius of Kalskag, Joseph P. Mike of Kotlik and Greg J. Roczicka of Bethel have been reappointed.

            The Western Interior Regional Advisory Council will welcome new member Jenny K. Pelkola of Galena, while Carl M. Morgan, Jr. of Aniak has been reappointed.

            On the Seward Peninsula Regional Advisory Council, Elizabeth A. Mokiyuk of Savoonga is a new member, while Thomas Gray of White Mountain and Elmer K. Seetot Jr. of Brevig Mission are re-appointees.

            The Southeast Alaska Regional Advisory Council has three new members; Merle N.  Hawkins of Ketchikan, Joe O. Hotch of Haines, and Lee Wallace of Saxman, while Michael Bangs of Petersburg was reappointed.

            On the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council, Fred H. Elvsaas of Seldovia, John C. Lamb II of Hiline, and Tricia Waggoner of Palmer are new members, while Thomas M. Carpenter of Cordova, Ralph E. Lohse of McCarthy, and James R. Showalter of Sterling have been re-appointed.

            The Northwest Arctic Regional Advisory Council has three new members; Virgil D. Adams of Noatak, Austin Swan Sr. of Kivalina, and Walter G. Sampson of Kotzebue.  Enoch Shiedt Sr., also of Kotzebue, was reappointed.

            The North Slope Regional Advisory Council will welcome new member Lee Kayotuk of Kaktovik, who will join reappointed members Gordon Brower Sr. of Barrow and David A. Gunderson of Wainwright.

            On the Eastern Interior Regional Advisory Council, Richard C. Carroll Jr. of Fort Yukon and Matthew R. Frenzl of Delta Junction are new members, while Virgil Umphenour of North Pole was reappointed.

            Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Advisory Council does not have any new members, but Speridon M. Simeonoff Sr. of Akhiok was reappointed.

            Regional councils advise the Federal Subsistence Board on subsistence management regulations and policies and serve as a forum for public involvement in federal subsistence management.  Recommendations from regional councils carry significant weight in the federal process.  The Federal Subsistence Board must follow a recommendation from a regional council unless it is not supported by substantial evidence, violates recognized principles of fish and wildlife conservation, or would be detrimental to the satisfaction of subsistence needs.

            Currently, seventy percent of council members represent subsistence users, while the remaining thirty percent represent sport and commercial users.  The Federal Subsistence Board is in the process of reexamining the issue of balance on regional councils and will decide at their May 2007 meeting whether to continue the current council composition or adopt a new method for balancing regional councils.

 

 

Southeast Purse Seine Fishery Scrutinized (01/18/07)

 

Federal and State managers are examining sockeye harvests in the Southeast Alaska purse seine fishery to determine whether the fishery could be impacting subsistence harvests by residents of villages in Chatham Strait.  The Southeast Regional Advisory Council has raised concerns about the possibility that the commercial fishery might be catching sockeye that otherwise could be harvested for subsistence by residents of Angoon and Kake.  However, there have been no scale sampling or tagging studies done to determine whether any of the sockeye harvested in the traditional purse seine areas are bound for subsistence streams.

            The Regional Council expressed a preference that the issue be resolved cooperatively with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, but also noted that a petition for extraterritorial jurisdiction was a possibility if the issues are not resolved in a satisfactory manner.

            Federal agencies and the Federal Subsistence Board don’t have authority to manage fisheries in the state’s marine waters, but the U.S. Secretaries of Interior and Agriculture can intervene through federal powers of extraterritorial jurisdiction.  Federal subsistence officials say such an action would come only following proof of a failure to provide rural Alaskans with a subsistence priority on federal lands and that actions outside of federal jurisdiction directly caused the failure.

            Such a petition has been filed only once before, when the Alaska Board of Fisheries greatly expanded commercial fishing time in False Pass.  The action concerned some subsistence users, who feared increased harvest of fish bound for their traditional harvest areas.  Secretary of Interior Gale Norton declined to intervene, stating that it was unlikely the state’s action would result in a failure by the federal government to provide the rural subsistence priority.

            In the case of Chatham Strait sockeye, the Southeast Regional Advisory Council could petition the secretaries to intervene in the management of the commercial purse seine fishery.  The Regional Council set up a forum on January 22nd, where three council members met with seine fleet representatives and federal and state managers to discuss the best available scientific information.  The full council will receive a report on the issue at their February meeting in Kake and may take further action at that time.

 

 

Subcommittee Considers Kenai Peninsula Proposals (01/18/07)

 

Federal Subsistence Board members decided against forming a separate Regional Advisory Council for the Kenai Peninsula at a worksession November 16, 2006.  Instead, Kenai Peninsula matters will continue to be considered by the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council.  Following this decision, the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council voted to create a special subcommittee for the Kenai.

            The original proposal to create a separate resource region for the Kenai Peninsula was advanced by the Federal Subsistence Board as a way for stakeholders to have more input into federal subsistence fishery management decisions.  The Kenai is known for being an area in which fishery management decisions are often hotly debated.  A separate resource region would have led to formation of a Kenai Peninsula Regional Advisory Council, made up of stakeholders from the area and tasked with advising the Federal Subsistence Board on Kenai issues.

            The proposal met with substantial controversy, including opposition from the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council, which currently handles Kenai issues along with Prince William Sound, the Copper River drainage, the Cook Inlet  drainage and the inland waters and lands of the Glennallen area.  The Southcentral Council expressed a desire to continue to advise the board on the Kenai area.

            Although some stakeholders supported a separate council, others questioned the need for another resource region, the boundaries of the region, and the process the board used in making the proposal.  The board ultimately decided to continue with the current structure.

            To allow more stakeholder input within the current system, the Southcentral Council formed a subcommittee of stakeholders including representatives from the communities of Hope, Cooper Landing, and Ninilchik, the Kenai Peninsula Fisherman’s Association, the Upper Cook Inlet Drift Association, the Kenai River Professional Guides Association, the Kenai River Sportfishing Association, and the Salamatoff, Ninilchik, and Kenaitze tribes.

            The subcommittee will provide recommendations to the council on subsistence fishery proposals for federal waters within the Kenai, Kasilof and Swanson river drainages and Six Mile and Resurrection creek drainages.  The subcommittee’s work will focus on methods and means of harvest, harvest limits and fishing seasons.

            Proposals under consideration by the subcommittee include allowing subsistence fishing for Dolly Varden, lake trout, and rainbow trout by gillnet and steelhead by gillnet or rod and reel, along with a proposal to allow Ninilchik residents to harvest fish using a wide variety of methods including gillnets.

            The subcommittee will hold its first meeting February 2-3 in Soldotna to develop recommendations that will be provided to the Southcentral Council at their next meeting March 13-16.  In May, the Federal Subsistence Board will hear input from the Southcentral Council before making a decision on Kenai proposals.

 

 

Subsistence Halibut Survey Results (01/18/07)

 

Survey results are in, and a report from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game Subsistence Division estimates the statewide subsistence harvest of halibut in 2005 at 1.18 million pounds.  This number is very similar to the 2004 estimate of 1.19 million pounds.  Subsistence harvests represented about 1.5% of the total halibut removals in Alaska in 2005.

            At the end of 2005, 14,306 individuals had subsistence halibut permits, up four percent from the end of 2004.  The study found an estimated 5,621 individuals subsistence fished for halibut in 2005, compared to 5,984 individuals in 2004 and 4,942 individuals in 2003.  The estimated subsistence halibut harvest in 2005 was 55,875 fish or 1,178,222 pounds net weight.  The 2004 estimate was that 52,412 fish, or 1,193,162 pounds were harvested.

            Of the total subsistence halibut harvest in 2005, 70 percent was harvested with longlines and 30 percent was harvested with hand-operated gear.  This is a decrease in the percentage harvested using longlines compared to 2004, when 74 percent was harvested with longlines and 26 percent was harvested with hand-operated gear.  Of those using longline gear in 2005, 42 percent usually fished with 30 hooks, the maximum number allowed in most areas.

            An estimated 12,395 rockfish and 2,355 lingcod were caught while subsistence halibut fishing in 2005.  This is less than the reported harvest of 19,001 rockfish and 4,407 lingcod for 2004.

            The largest halibut subsistence harvest in 2005 occurred in Southeast Alaska, where 51 percent of the statewide total was caught.  Southcentral Alaska accounted for 36 percent of the harvest, while the western areas of the state all had comparatively small harvests.  The proportion of the statewide subsistence halibut harvest occurring in Southeast Alaska declined in 2005, down from 57% in 2004 and 60% in 2003.  Correspondingly, the portion occurring in South-central Alaska increased in 2005, up from 34% in 2004 and 27% in 2003.

            The report’s authors recommend that research be continued for two more years, so that five years of data under the current set of regulations governing gear, participation requirements, and daily harvest limits can be evaluated.  For more information or a copy of the report, visit http://www.subsistence.adfg.state.ak.us/ and click on Subsistence Harvests of Pacific Halibut in Alaska, 2005.

 

 

Federal Subsistence Board Calls for Proposals (01/18/07)

 

The Federal Subsistence Board is accepting proposals through March 23, 2007 to change subsistence fishing regulations on federal public lands and waters in Alaska.  This is the first step in the development of regulations for the April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 regulatory year.

            The board will consider proposals to change fishing seasons, harvest limits, restrictions on methods of harvest, and customary and traditional use determinations.  Federal public lands include national wildlife refuges; national parks, monuments and preserves; national forests; national wild and scenic rivers; and national conservation and recreation areas.  Federal subsistence regulations do not apply on State of Alaska lands, private lands, military lands, or federal lands selected by the State or Native corporations.

            To request a proposal form, contact the Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456 or by e-mail, subsistence@fws.gov.  The form can also be found under the Laws and Regulations – Fisheries section of the Federal Subsistence Program website, http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/home.html.

 

 

Federal Subsistence Board Meets to Determine Rural/Nonrural Status (12/11/06)

 

The Federal Subsistence Board meets December 12-13 at the Egan Center in Anchorage to consider changes to the rural/nonrural status of several Alaska communities. Only residents of rural areas are eligible to participate in federal subsistence hunts and fisheries.  There will be an opportunity for public comment during the meeting. Comments are sought on the following proposed changes:

Adak would change from nonrural to rural due to its remote location and a significant drop in population since it was last evaluated. 

Prudhoe Bay would change from rural to nonrural since it lacks many of the characteristics typical of a rural community.

Point MacKenzie would be grouped with the nonrural Wasilla area and would change from rural to nonrural.

Fritz Creek East (not including Voznesenka) and the North Fork Road area would be grouped with the nonrural Homer area and would change from rural to nonrural.

Sterling's expanded boundaries would be fully included in the nonrural Kenai Area.

The nonrural Ketchikan area would be expanded to include all those living on the road system connected to the City of Ketchikan (except Saxman), as well as residents of Pennock Island and parts of Gravina Island. However, Saxman would remain separate and rural.

The Kodiak area, including the City of Kodiak, the Mill Bay area, the Coast Guard Station, Women's Bay and Bells Flats, would be grouped and would change from rural to nonrural. The population of this area is approximately 12,000, well above the population threshold in Federal subsistence regulations of 7,000 at which a community or area is presumed to be nonrural. Places excluded from this nonrural grouping are Chiniak, Pasagshak, Anton Larsen, Kalsin Bay and Middle Bay, as well as villages and communities on the Kodiak Archipelago not connected by road to the Kodiak area. These places would remain rural.

For additional information, please contact Maureen Clark or Larry Buklis with the Federal Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456 or (907) 786-3888.

 


Application Period Open for Regional Advisory Council Seats - Deadline January 10th (12/11/06)

 

The Office of Subsistence Management is accepting applications and nominations to serve on the Regional Advisory Councils that advise the Federal Subsistence Board. The deadline for submitting applications is January 10, 2007.


The councils meet twice yearly and advise the Federal Subsistence Board on subsistence management regulations and policies. They also serve as a forum for regional public involvement in federal subsistence management. Council members are knowledgeable about subsistence, commercial, and sport uses in their region. Regional Council recommendations carry a great deal of weight in the Board's decision making process.


For an application or additional information, please contact Ann Wilkinson at the Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456 or (907) 786-3676.

 

Federal Subsistence Board Decides Kenai, Southeast Issues at Worksession (12/11/06)
 

At a worksession held November 16th and 17th in Anchorage, the Federal Subsistence Board decided against forming a Kenai Peninsula Regional Advisory Council, made a positive customary and traditional use finding for Ninilchik residents on the Kenai River, approved a fishery on Tustumena Lake, and made a positive customary and traditional use finding for residents of Gustavus, in Southeast Alaska. 

 

After considering the formation of a Kenai Peninsula Subsistence Resource Region, which would have resulted in a separate Regional Advisory Council for the Kenai Peninsula, the board decided instead to keep the current structure. As a result of this decision, the Southcentral Alaska Regional Advisory Council will continue to address federal subsistence fish and wildlife issues on the Kenai Peninsula.

In January of 2006, the Board made a positive customary and traditional use finding for Ninilchik residents on the Kasilof River, but declined to make a positive determination for the Kenai River.  Subsistence users requested that the Board reconsider the decision.  At the worksession, the Board made a positive customary and traditional use determination for the residents of Ninilchik for all fish in the Kenai River area. This determination will allow Ninilchik residents to harvest fish under Federal subsistence regulations in those waters. Proposed changes to existing fishing seasons, methods, and harvest limits for this area will be considered by the Board in May of 2007.

Acting on a Special Action Request from the Ninilchik Traditional Council, the Board approved a temporary fishery on Tustumena Lake for Ninilchik residents. The fishery, which will take place only this winter unless permanent regulations are adopted, allows harvest of lake trout, rainbow trout, and Dolly Varden, through the ice, using jigs or gillnets. Federal subsistence harvest permits will be required and harvest will be closely monitored.  All harvests must be reported within 72 hours of the permitee’s leaving the area. The total harvest of each species will be limited, and all gillnet fishing will cease once the harvest limit for any species is reached.


Finally, acting on another request for reconsideration, the Board made a positive customary and traditional use determination for the community of Gustavus, allowing the harvest of salmon, Dolly Varden, trout, smelt, and euchalon in District 14 in Southeast Alaska. As a result of this ruling, residents of Gustavus will be able to join Hoonah residents in harvesting these species under Federal subsistence regulations.

For additional information, please contact Pete Probasco at (800) 478-1456 or (907) 786-3403.

 

 

Public Comment Sought on Kenai Fisheries Proposals - Deadline January 5th (12/11/06)

 

The Federal Subsistence Board is accepting written comments through January 5, 2007, on proposals to change Federal subsistence fishing regulations for the Kenai Peninsula. The proposals could change seasons, harvest limits, methods for the taking of fish and shellfish, or customary and traditional use determinations and could be effective beginning April 1, 2007.

 

The proposal book can be found at http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/home.html  or by contacting the Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456 or (907) 786-3888.

 

Comments should reference the proposal number and should be sent to Bill Knauer by e-mail at subsistence@fws.gov . Those without e-mail access can fax comments to (907) 786-3898 or mail them to:

Federal Subsistence Board

Attn: Bill Knauer
Office of Subsistence Management
3601 C Street, Suite 1030
Anchorage, AK 99503

 

In addition to written comments, the public is welcome to provide comments at Regional Advisory Council meetings in February and March or at the Federal Subsistence Board meeting in May 2007.

 

 

26 Changes to Subsistence Fishing Regulations Proposed (09/19/06)

This month, Federal Regional Advisory Councils began consideration of proposals that include a closure to commercial herring fishing in Sitka Sound, establishment of new subsistence fisheries on the Kenai Peninsula, and restrictions on subsistence fishing on the Yukon River.

The Federal Office of Subsistence Management has received 26 proposals to change subsistence fishing regulations across Alaska.  This represents a decline from the past three years, when the number of proposals ranged between 30 and 40.           Proponents have suggested changing regulations to address problems that range from concerns about conservation of a species to difficulty meeting subsistence needs.

Southeast Alaska Area

The Southeast Alaska Regional Advisory Council and the Sitka Tribe of Alaska have both proposed closing federal waters in Sitka Sound to   commercial herring harvest to provide additional subsistence opportunity.  The Sitka Sound sac roe fishery is one of the most lucrative commercial herring fisheries in the state.  51 permit holders use purse seines to compete for a quota that has averaged 10,000 tons in recent years.

Subsistence users have expressed concern at the state Board of Fisheries for several years that the large commercial herring harvest in Sitka Sound is interfering with meeting subsistence needs in the area, where a traditional harvest of herring roe on branches is practiced by residents. The state board has responded by creating a fishery task force and requiring fish and game to consult with a tribal liaison about openings, but has stopped short of placing restrictions on the commercial fishery.

Effective September 25th, the federal government has taken over jurisdiction of the submerged waters surrounding Mahknati

Island, near the Sitka airport. Now that a portion of the sound is under federal jurisdiction, subsistence users have turned to the federal process to address their concerns. They are requesting that the federal jurisdiction be closed to commercial fishing to provide a subsistence only zone.

 

The Southeast Regional Council has also proposed modifying the customary and traditional use finding for all fish in districts 12, 13, and 14 to include all residents of the area. Currently, residents of Angoon, Sitka, and Hoonah have positive customary and traditional use findings for specific locations within the area for salmon, Dolly Varden, trout, smelt, and eulachon.

A proposal received during the last regulatory cycle that would have extended the positive customary and traditional use finding for   district 14 to include residents of Gustavus was tabled to allow a broader examination of traditional use patterns for all residents of the Icy Strait/Cross Sound area after it met with opposition from some Hoonah residents.

Under federal regulations, subsistence fisheries are open to all rural residents of Alaska unless a positive customary and traditional use finding has been made. Once such a finding has been made, only those residents identified in the finding may fish in that area.

Several proposals were also received to modify steelhead regulations in the Sitka area, including setting a 36 inch minimum size for the Salmon Lake drainage, setting a 36 inch minimum size, limiting gear to a rod and reel without bait, and prohibiting snagging for all streams in the Sitka area, requiring harvest reporting within 48 hours, and limiting permits to one per household.

Federal subsistence fisheries for steelhead in Southeast Alaska were created by the board in 2005, despite concerns from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game about vulnerable stock status on small streams. Similar proposals to restrict the fishery near Petersburg and Juneau were rejected by the board during the 2006 regulatory cycle. Federal permits and harvest reporting are required to participate in the fishery. Reported harvest for 2005 was 24 steelhead taken on Prince of Wales Island and 8 taken elsewhere in Southeast.

Modifying the season and weekly opening schedule for sockeye salmon near Klawock has also been proposed.

Prince William Sound Area

In the Prince William Sound Area, it has been proposed that fish wheels must be positioned at least 200 feet apart and that they must be stored above the high water mark. Opening the lower Copper River to subsistence fishing for salmon with a dip net or a rod and reel with bait has also been proposed.

 

Cook Inlet Area

The board will consider whether to revise the customary and traditional use determination made in January 2006 for residents of Tuxedni Bay. The area to which the finding applies is somewhat ambiguous and is more expansive than what was originally proposed or recommended.

Proposals to allow subsistence fishing for Dolly Varden, lake trout, and rainbow trout by gillnet and steelhead by gillnet or rod and reel were deferred from the last proposal cycle to allow the board to first make a positive customary and traditional use finding for the area.

These proposals, along with a proposal to allow Ninilchik residents to harvest fish using a wide variety of methods are published in the proposal book.  However, the board has decided to extend the proposal deadline for the area; it is likely that all fishery proposals for the area will be considered at a May 2007 board meeting.

Bristol Bay Area

For the Bristol Bay Area, proposals will be considered that would allow the use of drift gillnets in the Togiak River and expand    allowable gear in Lake Clark and its tributaries to include beach seines, spears, arrows, snagging, and bare hands.

 

Yukon-Northern Area

The Eastern Interior Regional Advisory Council has submitted four proposals for changes on the Yukon River to address a possible decline in the size of Chinook salmon returning to the river. Proposed changes include establishing mandatory fishing schedules, restricting mesh size, and restricting the depth of gillnets. Similar proposals were discussed at the 2006 Federal Subsistence Board meeting in January. At that time, Regional Councils from different parts of the river had conflicting recommendations.  In an attempt to build consensus, the board recommended a working group be formed with the goal of developing proposals for both the Alaska Board of Fisheries, which regulates commercial fishing on the river, and the Federal Subsistence Board. The working group will begin meeting this fall.

The board will defer review and action on these four proposals to provide an opportunity for the working group to address this issue. Depending on the results of the working group, the Federal Subsistence Board could implement its recommendations as soon as the 2007 fishing season. The board will act on these four proposals and any others dealing with this issue either at that time or during the following regulatory cycle.

Identical restrictions on commercial users in the river have also been proposed to the Alaska Board of Fisheries, which will consider changes to fisheries in the area at their January 2007 meeting in Anchorage.

No proposals were received for the Yakutat, Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak, Norton Sound-Port Clarence, Kuskokwim, or Chignik areas.  To view the proposals, visit our proposals page.

The proposals will be considered by the Regional Advisory Council for the affected area at meetings this fall. For the scheduled        Regional Council meeting in your area, see the calendar below. Regional Council recommendations and public comments will be considered by the board at a January meeting, where they will take action on the proposals. Changes will take effect April 1, 2007.

The board is accepting written comments on the proposals until their meeting in January. Written comments can be sent to: Federal Subsistence Board, 3601 C Street, Suite 1030, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, e-mailed to subsistence@fws.gov, or faxed to (907) 786-3898 (Attn: Bill Knauer).

Kodiak May Lose Rural Status - Changes Also Proposed for Other Communities (09/19/06)

Under a proposed rule published by the Federal Subsistence Board, residents of Kodiak would lose their rural status along with their ability to participate in federal subsistence hunts and fisheries.

Residents of the greater Kodiak area are currently considered rural residents and therefore are eligible to participate in the federal subsistence program. Under the proposal, the City of Kodiak, the Mill Bay area, the Coast Guard Station, Women's Bay and Bells Flats would be grouped and would change from rural to non-rural. The combined area has a population of around 12,000, well over the threshold of 7,000 residents at which federal regulations say an area is presumed to be non-rural.

Places excluded from this non-rural grouping are Chiniak, Pasagshak, Anton Larsen,  Kalsin Bay and Middle Bay, as well as communities on the Kodiak Archipelago not connected by road to the Kodiak area. These places would remain rural.

Some community residents are upset by the possibility of a change in status, and are attempting to convince the Federal           Subsistence Board to preserve Kodiak’s rural status. Board members have scheduled public hearings in Kodiak September 20th and 21st to hear testimony on community concerns and reasons why Kodiak should or should not remain rural. 

Written comments will be accepted until October 27, 2006 on the proposed rule, which would also change the rural or non-rural status of several other communities and areas. The board will make a decision on a final rule in December 2006. Comments are sought on the following proposed changes:

Adak would change from non-rural to rural due to its remote location and a 94 percent drop in population since it was last evaluated. 

Prudhoe Bay would change from rural to non-rural. The board reached a preliminary conclusion that the area is an industrial enclave that lacks many of the characteristics typical of a rural community.

Point MacKenzie would be grouped with the non-rural Wasilla area and would change from rural to non-rural. Staff analysis suggests that the area is economically and socially integrated with Wasilla.

Fritz Creek East (not including Voznesenka) and the North Fork Road area would be grouped with the non-rural Homer area and would become non-rural.

Ketchikan’s non-rural area would be expanded to include all those living on the road system connected to the City of Ketchikan (except Saxman), as well as residents of Pennock Island and parts of Gravina Island. Saxman would remain separate and rural.

The analysis used by the board in developing the proposed rule can be found under the "Issues in Depth" section of the Federal         Subsistence Management Program website at http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/home.html. Written comments on this issue can be sent to subsistence@fws.gov, faxed to (907) 786-3898, or mailed to: Theo Matuskowitz, Federal Subsistence Board, Office of Subsistence Management, 3601 C St., Ste. 1030, Anchorage, AK 99503.

Federal Subsistence Board members have scheduled public hearings in Kodiak (September 20-21), Ketchikan and Saxman (September 25-26), and Sitka (October 10) to take public comment on the proposed changes. The board will also be accepting recommendations on this issue from Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils, which will consider and accept testimony on the changes during their fall meetings. The board will meet December 12-13 at the Egan Center in Anchorage to hear public comment and to draft a final rule. For additional information, please contact Maureen Clark or Larry Buklis with the Federal Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456 or (907) 786-3888.

 

Court Upholds Rural Subsistence Priority (09/19/06)

A federal appeals court has dismissed a challenge to the federal subsistence program’s rural preference, which restricts participation in subsistence hunts and fisheries on federal public lands to rural residents of Alaska.

 

The lawsuit, filed by the Alaska Constitutional Legal Defense Conservation Fund, charged that the rura preference violates the equal protection clause by not providing equal access to fish and game to urban residents.  The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, finding that the rural priority serves a legitimate government interest by protecting the subsistence way of life for rural Alaskans.

 

The group of urban  Alaskans and non-resident hunters and fishermen plans to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.

 

Kenai Fishery Proposals Due October 20th (09/19/06)

At the request of the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council, the Federal Subsistence Board has extended the deadline for  proposed changes to federal subsistence fishery regulations on the Kenai Peninsula until October 20th, 2006.

The board will consider proposals to change fishing regulations on the Kenai Peninsula, including seasons, harvest limits, harvest methods, and customary and traditional use determinations when it meets in May 2007.  At the same time, the board will consider proposed changes to federal subsistence hunting and trapping regulations statewide.

To request a proposal form or for more information contact Bill Knauer at the Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456 or (907) 786-3873 or by e-mail, bill_knauer@fws.gov. The proposal form can also be found on the Federal Subsistence Management Program’s website, http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/home.html.

 

Written C&T and Closure Criteria Still Pending (09/19/06)

Written policies on customary and traditional use determinations and closures to non-subsistence uses are still in the process of being developed, and are not yet ready for adoption by the Federal Subsistence Board.

The policies are the result of a working group of federal and state managers. The Secretary of Interior requested the board develop and adopt written policies on the two topics after the State of Alaska expressed some specific concerns about the federal subsistence program.  Specifically, the State objected to the manner in which the Federal Subsistence Board makes customary and traditional use determinations, criticizing the lack of clear and consistent criteria and saying that determinations are often made without substantial supporting evidence.

One of the most  recent customary and traditional use determinations made by the board has drawn criticism from the state. The State has requested that the federal board reconsider a January decision making a positive customary and traditional use finding for residents of Ninilchik, Hope, and Cooper Landing on the Kenai Peninsula, calling it  arbitrary, capricious, and a violation of the law. 

The written policy on customary and traditional use determinations is still in the development phase and is not yet available for review.

The State of Alaska also expressed concern that when closing areas to non-subsistence uses and users, substantial evidence should exist that the closure is necessary and any closures should be reviewed on a regular basis. After reviewing a draft closure policy prepared by federal staff, the state continued to have concerns.  According to comments submitted by Commissioner of Fish and Game McKie Campbell, the policy does not contain specific written policies and procedures that outline how the board will make closure decisions and therefore falls short of the goal of developing the policy.

Copies of the draft closure policy are available and can be obtained by calling the Office of Subsistence Management at (800) 478-1456. The Federal Subsistence Board  considered the policy at a worksession August 25th, but decided against adopting the policy to allow more time for edits and revisions.

At this time, it is uncertain whether the closure policy will be reviewed by Regional Councils again prior to adoption, or when it might be reconsidered by the Federal Subsistence Board.  The board will consider at least one proposed closure to non-subsistence uses when they meet in January, a closure to commercial herring fishing in federal waters in the Sitka Sound area. 

 

Board Denies Kasilof Coho Fishery (09/19/06)

The Federal Subsistence Board has denied a special action request that would have created a subsistence coho fishery on the Kasilof River this fall. The fishery would have allowed residents of Ninilchik to use dipnets to harvest up to 500 coho salmon on a seven mile stretch of the Kasilof River upstream of Silver Salmon rapids. Following the board’s decision, the Ninilchik        Traditional Council filed a lawsuit in U.S District Court, asking that the fishery be allowed to take place.

 

The board considered the request at a worksession September 5th, where a motion to approve the new fishery failed after the board deadlocked on a 3-3 vote.  The request was authored by the Ninilchik Traditional Council and gained support from the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council at a Council meeting in August. However, the proposal met with opposition from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and other stakeholders, who questioned the public process leading up to the board’s worksession.

Although members of the board called the proposal reasonable, some questioned whether or not extenuating circumstances existed. The board must find that extenuating circumstances exist to adopt a proposal outside the normal regulatory cycle. Although the Board’s legal counsel advised that they would be justified in making such a finding, the State of Alaska disagreed. “There    certainly isn’t any crisis or lack of opportunity to take fish,” said Deputy Commissioner Wayne  Regelin.

The Ninilchik Traditional Council also requested that the board take another special action to allow a winter gillnet fishery on Tustumena Lake.  That request will be considered by the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council at their October 17-20 worksession in Homer.  After receiving the Council's recommendation, the board will schedule another worksession to take action on the second request.

Currently, federal subsistence fisheries on the Kenai Peninsula follow identical regulations as state sport fisheries. In January, the board made a positive customary and traditional use finding for the residents of Ninilchik, Hope, and Cooper Landing. Identifying eligible rural residents is the first step toward developing subsistence fisheries in the area.

At the January 2006 meeting, the board requested that the Southcentral Regional Advisory Council form a working group of stakeholders in the area to develop subsistence fishery regulations. Consideration of new fisheries was deferred pending results from the working group. However, the Southcentral Council decided against   forming a stakeholder group.

Instead, the board proposed forming an eleventh Regional Advisory Council for the Kenai Peninsula. The Southcentral Regional Council objected to the idea, and